Concrete strength monitoring plays an important role in ensuring the safety and performance of civil engineering structures. Conventional methods used for determining compressive strength are generally destructive in nature and do not allow continuous monitoring of concrete behavior during the curing period. In the present study, an Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled monitoring system using piezoelectric sensors was developed to assess the strength development of M40 grade concrete. Two sensor configurations, namely direct transmission mode and indirect transmission mode, were considered for monitoring the propagation of stress waves through concrete cube specimens. Standard concrete cube specimens measuring 150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm were prepared and tested at curing ages of 7, 14, and 28 days. A function generator operating at a frequency of 10 kHz was used to excite the actuator sensor, while the received signal was processed through an electronic signal-conditioning circuit consisting of an LM324 operational amplifier and supporting components. The amplitude response obtained from the sensors was transmitted using a NodeMCU ESP8266 module and visualized through the ThingSpeak cloud platform. The compressive strength of the concrete specimens was determined using a Compression Testing Machine (CTM) following completion of the monitoring process. The experimental observations indicated that the amplitude values increased with the gain in concrete strength for both transmission modes. Correlation analysis showed a strong relationship between amplitude response and compressive strength, demonstrating the suitability of the developed IoT-enabled piezoelectric monitoring system for non-destructive concrete strength evaluation.
| Published in | American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 14, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajce.20261404.11 |
| Page(s) | 213-225 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Concrete Strength, IoT, Piezoelectric Sensors, Direct and Indirect Transmission, Nondestructive Test
Correlation Coefficient Range (R) | Degree of Relationship |
|---|---|
1.00 to 0.90 | Very Strong |
0.89 to 0.70 | Strong |
0.69 to 0.40 | Moderate |
0.39 to 0.10 | Weak |
0.10 to 0.00 | Negligible |
Sr. No | Material | kg/m3 | By Weight | Volumetric Equivalent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cement (OPC 53 Grade) | 430 | 50 kg | 1 bag |
2 | Fly Ash | 115 | 13.4 kg | 8.5 liter |
3 | Fine Aggregate (Crushed Sand) | 777 | 90.3 kg | 58.0 liter |
4 | Coarse Aggregate (20 mm) | 571 | 66.3 kg | 44.5 liter |
5 | Coarse Aggregate (10 mm) | 397 | 46.1 kg | 30.8 liter |
6 | Water | 207 | 24.0 liter | 24.0 liter |
7 | Admixture (Plasticizer) | 6 | 0.70 liter | 0.70 liter |
Amplitude (V) Indirect mode | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Days | Cube 1 | Cube 2 | Cube 3 | Average |
7 | 1.18 | 1.2 | 1.22 | 1.2 |
14 | 1.27 | 1.32 | 1.29 | 1.29 |
28 | 1.44 | 1.41 | 1.47 | 1.44 |
Amplitude (V) Direct mode | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Days | Cube 1 | Cube 2 | Cube 3 | Average |
7 | 0.88 | 0.9 | 0.92 | 0.9 |
14 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.96 |
28 | 1.11 | 1.1 | 1.12 | 1.11 |
Compressive strength (CTM) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Days | Cube 1 | Cube 2 | Cube 3 | Average |
7 | 30.6 | 31.3 | 32.5 | 31.5 |
14 | 40.5 | 39.6 | 41.2 | 40.4 |
28 | 49.1 | 48.5 | 47.2 | 48.3 |
PZT | Lead Zirconate Titanate |
EMI | Electromechanical Impedance |
NDT | Non-Destructive Test |
IoT | Internet of Things |
DIC | Digital Image Correlation |
MCU | Microcontroller Unit |
kHz | Kilohertz |
CTM | Compression Testing Machine |
N/mm2 | Newton Per Square Millimetre |
OPC | Ordinary Portland Cement |
Wi-Fi | Wireless Fidelity |
Kg | Kilograms |
m3 | Cubic Metre |
IS | Indian Standard |
UPV | Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity |
| [1] | Guo, Y. Analysis on Concrete Construction Technology in Civil Engineering Construction. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2021, 2011(1), 012023. |
| [2] | Huang, F., Zhang, J., Zhou, G., Gao, H., Li, S. & Fu, M. IoT-Based Quality Control Technology for Concrete Pavement Construction. Advances in Computer and Materials Science Research. 2026, 6(1), 190-200. |
| [3] | Han, G., Su, Y. F., He, R., Huang, C., Kong, Z., Lin, G., Feng, Y. & Lu, N. Real-time concrete strength monitoring using piezoelectric sensors and deep learning. Nature Communications. 2025, 17(1), 473. |
| [4] | Evangelista, A., Arumugam, A. & Abate, M. S. Evaluation of the Parameters Influencing the Results of Non-Destructive Testing Methods for Concrete Strength. Preprints.org. 2025. |
| [5] | Pajalić, A., Dekić, E., Crnkić, H., Muratović, A., Japić, A. & Kozlica, E. Monitoring the development of concrete strength using a sclerometer. 15th International Scientific Conference on Manufacturing Engineering Development and Modernization of Manufacturing, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2025, 403-410. |
| [6] | Miller, D., Ho, N. M., Talebian, N. & Javanbakht, Z. Real time Monitoring of Early Age Compressive Strength of Concrete using an IoT enabled Monitoring System: An Investigative Study. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. 2023, 8(2), 75. |
| [7] | Duddi, M., Kocherla, A. & Subramaniam, K. In-situ Vibroacoustic sensing of Concrete Structures with Embedded Smart PZT Sensors. Preprint. 2024. |
| [8] | Quah, T. K. N., Vo, K., Tay, Y. W. D., Tan, M. J., Wong, T. N. & Li, K. H. H. Real Time Assessment of Smart Concrete Inspection with Piezoelectric Sensors. Electronics. 2023, 12(18), 3762. |
| [9] | Pham, Q. Q., Dang, N. L. & Kim, J. T. Smart PZT-Embedded Sensors for Impedance Monitoring in Prestressed Concrete Anchorage. Sensors. 2021, 21(23), 7918. |
| [10] | Narayanan, A., Subramaniam, K. Damage Assessment in Concrete Structures using PZT patches Damage Assessment in Concrete Structures using PZT patches. 2nd RN Raikar Memorial Intl. Conference & Banthia-Basheer Intl. Symposium on Advances in Science & Technology of Concrete. Mumbai, India. |
| [11] | Kumar, J., Sharma, D., Bansal, T. & Choi, S. J. Monitoring and Retrofitting of Reinforced Concrete Beam Incorporating Refuse-Derived Fuel Fly Ash Through Piezoelectric Sensors. Materials. 2026, 19(2), 432. |
| [12] | Govindaraju, S., Basha, G. T. M. N. A. Real-time concrete strength monitoring: an IoT-enabled framework integrating electrochemical and fiber optic sensors for structural integrity assessment. Revista Matéria. 2025, 30, e20240784. |
| [13] | Narwade, R. P., Jadhav, R. Concrete strength monitoring and damage detection using piezoelectric-based wireless sensor. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters. 2025, 16(1), 40-50. |
| [14] | Andi, M., Baehaki. & Khadafi, D. A. Correlation of reinforcement concrete quality based on variations in UPV testing methods. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019, 673(1), 012043. |
| [15] | Artiyasa, M., Kusumah, I. H., Suryana, A., Edwinanto., Sidik, A. D. W. M. & Junfithrana, A. P. Comparative Study of Internet of Things (IoT) Platform for Smart Home Lighting Control Using NodeMCU with Thingspeak and Blynk Web Applications. Fidelity: Jurnal Teknik Elektro. 2020, 2(1), 1-6. |
| [16] | Nasution, W. S. L., Nusa, P. Implementation of the Internet of Things (IoT) for Remote Light Control using NodeMCU Esp8266 and Thingspeak Via Website-based Internet. Journal of Computer Science and Technology. 2023, 3(1), 33-39. |
| [17] | Schober, P., Boer, C. & Schwarte L. A. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2018, 126(5), 1763-1768. |
| [18] | IS 516:1959 (1959). Indian Standard Methods of test for Strength of Concrete (Reaffirmed 2004). Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan. 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India. |
| [19] | IS 456:2000 (2000). Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice (Reaffirmed 2005). Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan. 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India. |
APA Style
Rasal, Y. J., Narwade, R. (2026). Application of IoT-enabled Piezoelectric Sensors for Strength Monitoring of Concrete by Direct and Indirect Transmission. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(4), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20261404.11
ACS Style
Rasal, Y. J.; Narwade, R. Application of IoT-enabled Piezoelectric Sensors for Strength Monitoring of Concrete by Direct and Indirect Transmission. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2026, 14(4), 213-225. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20261404.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajce.20261404.11,
author = {Yash Janardhan Rasal and Raju Narwade},
title = {Application of IoT-enabled Piezoelectric Sensors for Strength Monitoring of Concrete by Direct and Indirect Transmission},
journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering},
volume = {14},
number = {4},
pages = {213-225},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20261404.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20261404.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20261404.11},
abstract = {Concrete strength monitoring plays an important role in ensuring the safety and performance of civil engineering structures. Conventional methods used for determining compressive strength are generally destructive in nature and do not allow continuous monitoring of concrete behavior during the curing period. In the present study, an Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled monitoring system using piezoelectric sensors was developed to assess the strength development of M40 grade concrete. Two sensor configurations, namely direct transmission mode and indirect transmission mode, were considered for monitoring the propagation of stress waves through concrete cube specimens. Standard concrete cube specimens measuring 150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm were prepared and tested at curing ages of 7, 14, and 28 days. A function generator operating at a frequency of 10 kHz was used to excite the actuator sensor, while the received signal was processed through an electronic signal-conditioning circuit consisting of an LM324 operational amplifier and supporting components. The amplitude response obtained from the sensors was transmitted using a NodeMCU ESP8266 module and visualized through the ThingSpeak cloud platform. The compressive strength of the concrete specimens was determined using a Compression Testing Machine (CTM) following completion of the monitoring process. The experimental observations indicated that the amplitude values increased with the gain in concrete strength for both transmission modes. Correlation analysis showed a strong relationship between amplitude response and compressive strength, demonstrating the suitability of the developed IoT-enabled piezoelectric monitoring system for non-destructive concrete strength evaluation.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Application of IoT-enabled Piezoelectric Sensors for Strength Monitoring of Concrete by Direct and Indirect Transmission AU - Yash Janardhan Rasal AU - Raju Narwade Y1 - 2026/07/08 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20261404.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajce.20261404.11 T2 - American Journal of Civil Engineering JF - American Journal of Civil Engineering JO - American Journal of Civil Engineering SP - 213 EP - 225 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8737 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20261404.11 AB - Concrete strength monitoring plays an important role in ensuring the safety and performance of civil engineering structures. Conventional methods used for determining compressive strength are generally destructive in nature and do not allow continuous monitoring of concrete behavior during the curing period. In the present study, an Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled monitoring system using piezoelectric sensors was developed to assess the strength development of M40 grade concrete. Two sensor configurations, namely direct transmission mode and indirect transmission mode, were considered for monitoring the propagation of stress waves through concrete cube specimens. Standard concrete cube specimens measuring 150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm were prepared and tested at curing ages of 7, 14, and 28 days. A function generator operating at a frequency of 10 kHz was used to excite the actuator sensor, while the received signal was processed through an electronic signal-conditioning circuit consisting of an LM324 operational amplifier and supporting components. The amplitude response obtained from the sensors was transmitted using a NodeMCU ESP8266 module and visualized through the ThingSpeak cloud platform. The compressive strength of the concrete specimens was determined using a Compression Testing Machine (CTM) following completion of the monitoring process. The experimental observations indicated that the amplitude values increased with the gain in concrete strength for both transmission modes. Correlation analysis showed a strong relationship between amplitude response and compressive strength, demonstrating the suitability of the developed IoT-enabled piezoelectric monitoring system for non-destructive concrete strength evaluation. VL - 14 IS - 4 ER -